2003 Alpina B3 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2003 Alpina B3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alpina B3 (301 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Alpina B3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Alpina B3 (362 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2003 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Alpina B3 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Alpina | Jeep |
| Model | B3 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3344 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 362 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2380 mm |
