2003 Alpina B3 vs. 2006 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alpina B3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alpina B3 would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alpina B3 (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2006 Ford F-250. (177 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford F-250.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Alpina B3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alpina B3. (362 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alpina B3.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Alpina B3 | 2006 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Alpina | Ford |
Model | B3 | F-250 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3346 cc | 4198 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 362 Nm | 500 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93.9 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 17.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 6250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 114 L |