2003 Alpina B3 vs. 2010 Ford F-450

To start off, 2010 Ford F-450 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alpina B3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alpina B3 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-450 (326 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2003 Alpina B3. (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 2003 Alpina B3.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-450 (814 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 452 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alpina B3. (362 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alpina B3.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Alpina B3 2010 Ford F-450
Make Alpina Ford
Model B3 F-450
Year Released 2003 2010
Body Type Station Wagon Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3346 cc 6400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 301 HP 326 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 3000 RPM
Torque 362 Nm 814 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.7:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 6670 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 2430 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 2030 mm
Wheelbase Size 3000 mm 4390 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.1 L/100km 7.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 144 L