2003 Alpina B3 vs. 2012 Ford E-350

To start off, 2012 Ford E-350 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Alpina B3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Alpina B3 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Alpina B3 (276 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2012 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1270 kg more than 2003 Alpina B3.

Because 2003 Alpina B3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Alpina B3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford E-350 (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Alpina B3. (335 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Alpina B3.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Alpina B3 2012 Ford E-350
Make Alpina Ford
Model B3 E-350
Year Released 2003 2012
Body Type Sedan Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3300 cc 5400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 276 HP 255 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 4500 RPM
Torque 335 Nm 474 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Flex Fuel
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Vehicle Weight 1560 kg 2830 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 5504 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 2017 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 2111 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 3505 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 132 L