2003 Ariel Atom vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 2003 Ariel Atom is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ariel Atom (109 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ariel Atom should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 508 kg more than 2003 Ariel Atom.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ariel Atom (148 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Ariel Atom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ariel Atom | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Ariel | Holden |
Model | Atom | FX |
Year Released | 2003 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2620 mm |