2003 Ariel Atom vs. 1961 Austin A 60
To start off, 2003 Ariel Atom is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,621 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ariel Atom (109 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1961 Austin A 60. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ariel Atom should accelerate faster than 1961 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Austin A 60 weights approximately 658 kg more than 2003 Ariel Atom.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ariel Atom (148 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Ariel Atom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ariel Atom | 1961 Austin A 60 | |
Make | Ariel | Austin |
Model | Atom | A 60 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1621 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2550 mm |