2003 Ariel Atom vs. 1982 Zastava 750
To start off, 2003 Ariel Atom is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ariel Atom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ariel Atom (109 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ariel Atom should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Zastava 750 weights approximately 178 kg more than 2003 Ariel Atom.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ariel Atom (148 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Ariel Atom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ariel Atom | 1982 Zastava 750 | |
Make | Ariel | Zastava |
Model | Atom | 750 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 55 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 462 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2010 mm |