2003 Ariel Atom vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ariel Atom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ariel Atom would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 251 more horse power than 2003 Ariel Atom. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2003 Ariel Atom.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ariel Atom. (148 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ariel Atom.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ariel Atom | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Ariel | Holden |
| Model | Atom | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
