2003 Ascari KZ1 vs. 1949 Maserati A6GCS
To start off, 2003 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Maserati A6GCS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Maserati A6GCS would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ascari KZ1 (500 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 371 more horse power than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ascari KZ1 should accelerate faster than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ascari KZ1 weights approximately 730 kg more than 1949 Maserati A6GCS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ascari KZ1 | 1949 Maserati A6GCS | |
| Make | Ascari | Maserati |
| Model | KZ1 | A6GCS |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4941 cc | 1978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 620 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2636 mm | 2320 mm |
