2003 Ascari KZ1 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ascari KZ1 (500 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 292 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ascari KZ1 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 680 kg more than 2003 Ascari KZ1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ascari KZ1 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Ascari | Cadillac |
| Model | KZ1 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4941 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1852 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1138 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2636 mm | 3300 mm |
