2003 Ascari KZ1 vs. 1982 Austin Allegro
To start off, 2003 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ascari KZ1 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro.
Because 2003 Ascari KZ1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ascari KZ1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ascari KZ1 | 1982 Austin Allegro | |
| Make | Ascari | Austin |
| Model | KZ1 | Allegro |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4941 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1852 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1138 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2636 mm | 2450 mm |
