2003 Ascari KZ1 vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2003 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 130 kg more than 2003 Ascari KZ1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2003 Ascari KZ1 has manual transmission. 2003 Ascari KZ1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ascari KZ1 | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ascari | Oldsmobile |
Model | KZ1 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4941 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1852 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1138 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2636 mm | 2760 mm |