2003 Ascari KZ1 vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2003 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ascari KZ1 (500 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ascari KZ1 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 975 kg more than 2003 Ascari KZ1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ascari KZ1 (550 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2003 Ascari KZ1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ascari KZ1 | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Ascari | Ford |
Model | KZ1 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4941 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 550 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1852 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1138 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2636 mm | 3510 mm |