2003 Ascari KZ1 vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ascari KZ1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ascari KZ1 would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ascari KZ1 (500 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 385 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (115 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ascari KZ1 should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 235 kg more than 2003 Ascari KZ1.
Because 2003 Ascari KZ1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ascari KZ1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ascari KZ1 (550 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (280 Nm). This means 2003 Ascari KZ1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Ascari KZ1 | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Ascari | Saab |
Model | KZ1 | 9000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4941 cc | 2288 cc |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 550 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1585 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2636 mm | 2680 mm |