2003 Ascari KZ1 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ascari KZ1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ascari KZ1 would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ascari KZ1 (500 HP) has 390 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ascari KZ1 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Because 2003 Ascari KZ1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ascari KZ1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ascari KZ1 (550 Nm) has 397 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 2003 Ascari KZ1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Ascari KZ1 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Ascari | Holden |
| Model | KZ1 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4941 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 500 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 550 Nm | 153 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1852 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1138 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2636 mm | 2685 mm |
