2003 Aston Martin DB7 vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2003 Aston Martin DB7 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Aston Martin DB7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Aston Martin DB7 (414 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Comet. (198 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Aston Martin DB7 should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Comet.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Aston Martin DB7 (550 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mercury Comet. (382 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Aston Martin DB7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mercury Comet.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Aston Martin DB7 | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mercury |
Model | DB7 | Comet |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 4738 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 550 Nm | 382 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2950 mm |