2003 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1955 Buick 40
To start off, 2003 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Aston Martin DB9 (450 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Buick 40 weights approximately 15 kg more than 2003 Aston Martin DB9.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Aston Martin DB9 (557 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Buick 40. (447 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Aston Martin DB9 | 1955 Buick 40 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Buick |
Model | DB9 | 40 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 5277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 234 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 557 Nm | 447 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 1725 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3110 mm |