2003 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Aston Martin DB9 (450 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 365 kg more than 2003 Aston Martin DB9.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Aston Martin DB9 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Cadillac |
| Model | DB9 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5935 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 450 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 79 L |
