2003 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1979 Dodge Omni
To start off, 2003 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Aston Martin DB9 weights approximately 714 kg more than 1979 Dodge Omni.
Because 2003 Aston Martin DB9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Aston Martin DB9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Aston Martin DB9 | 1979 Dodge Omni | |
Make | Aston Martin | Dodge |
Model | DB9 | Omni |
Year Released | 2003 | 1979 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 1716 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 450 HP | 0 HP |
Top Speed | 300 km/hour | 146 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 49 L |