2003 Audi A2 vs. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford
To start off, 2003 Audi A2 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (105 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2003 Audi A2. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford weights approximately 600 kg more than 2003 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A2. (141 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A2 | 1954 Austin-Healey Tickford | |
Make | Audi | Austin-Healey |
Model | A2 | Tickford |
Year Released | 2003 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 1191 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2600 mm |