2003 Audi A2 vs. 1962 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2003 Audi A2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 1,897 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Toyota Crown (80 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Audi A2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Toyota Crown should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Toyota Crown weights approximately 360 kg more than 2003 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Toyota Crown (145 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A2. (126 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1962 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A2 | 1962 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | A2 | Crown |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1897 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.6 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 22.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 75 L |
