2003 Audi A2 vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2003 Audi A2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 74 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Volvo 220 weights approximately 120 kg more than 2003 Audi A2.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A2. (126 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1962 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A2 | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Audi | Volvo |
| Model | A2 | 220 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 45 L |
