2003 Audi A2 vs. 1980 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2003 Audi A2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Isuzu KB weights approximately 212 kg more than 2003 Audi A2.
Because 1980 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Audi A2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A2 | 1980 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Audi | Isuzu |
Model | A2 | KB |
Year Released | 2003 | 1980 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1191 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 75 mm |
Top Speed | 168 km/hour | 136 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.9 seconds | 21.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1142 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 50 L |