2003 Audi A2 vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A2 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2003 Audi A2. (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1593 kg more than 2003 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 349 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A2. (126 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A2 | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | A2 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 90.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75.6 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 2488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 132 L |
