2003 Audi A2 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A2 would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2003 Audi A2. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A2.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A2. (141 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A2 | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A2 | Raider |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1191 cc | 4703 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 141 Nm | 393 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 3 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 83 L |
