2003 Audi A2 vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A2 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (176 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2003 Audi A2. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 630 kg more than 2003 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (265 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A2. (141 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A2 | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A2 | BLS |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1191 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 141 Nm | 265 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 168 km/hour | 235 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.9 seconds | 7.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 3 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 58 L |