2003 Audi A2 vs. 2009 Lincoln Navigator
To start off, 2009 Lincoln Navigator is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A2 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Lincoln Navigator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lincoln Navigator (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 2003 Audi A2. (74 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln Navigator should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lincoln Navigator weights approximately 977 kg more than 2003 Audi A2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Lincoln Navigator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Lincoln Navigator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lincoln Navigator (495 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A2. (126 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2009 Lincoln Navigator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A2. 2009 Lincoln Navigator has automatic transmission and 2003 Audi A2 has manual transmission. 2003 Audi A2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Lincoln Navigator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A2 | 2009 Lincoln Navigator | |
Make | Audi | Lincoln |
Model | A2 | Navigator |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.5 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.6 mm | 105.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1872 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 5300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 106 L |