2003 Audi A3 vs. 1960 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Audi A3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2003 Audi A3. (100 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 995 kg more than 2003 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A3 | 1960 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 2200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 79 L |
