2003 Audi A3 vs. 1973 Matra-Simca M670
To start off, 2003 Audi A3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 2,999 cc (12 cylinders), 1973 Matra-Simca M670 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 (445 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 341 more horse power than 2003 Audi A3. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A3 weights approximately 615 kg more than 1973 Matra-Simca M670.
Because 1973 Matra-Simca M670 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Matra-Simca M670. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A3 | 1973 Matra-Simca M670 | |
| Make | Audi | Matra-Simca |
| Model | A3 | M670 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 445 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 11000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2570 mm |
