2003 Audi A3 vs. 1980 Zastava 2101

To start off, 2003 Audi A3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 3,188 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A3 (246 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A3 weights approximately 920 kg more than 1980 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Zastava 2101. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A3 (310 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 2101. 2003 Audi A3 has automatic transmission and 1980 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1980 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Audi A3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: