2003 Audi A3 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2003 Audi A3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2003 Audi A3. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 25 kg more than 2003 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A3 (250 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A3 | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
Model | A3 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1896 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |