2003 Audi A3 vs. 1995 Xedos 6
To start off, 2003 Audi A3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Xedos 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Xedos 6 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Xedos 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Xedos 6 (106 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Audi A3. (100 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Xedos 6 should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A3 weights approximately 65 kg more than 1995 Xedos 6.
Because 2003 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Xedos 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A3 (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Xedos 6. (138 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Xedos 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A3 | 1995 Xedos 6 | |
| Make | Audi | Xedos |
| Model | A3 | 6 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |
