2003 Audi A3 vs. 2011 Lotus Evora

To start off, 2011 Lotus Evora is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A3 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2003 Audi A3. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A3.

Because 2011 Lotus Evora is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Lotus Evora. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Lotus Evora (349 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A3. (250 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 2011 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A3.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Audi A3 2011 Lotus Evora
Make Audi Lotus
Model A3 Evora
Year Released 2003 2011
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 1896 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 104 HP 276 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 250 Nm 349 Nm
Torque RPM 1900 RPM 4700 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 4341 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1849 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1222 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2576 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 59 L