2003 Audi A4 vs. 1965 Pontiac Catalina
To start off, 2003 Audi A4 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Pontiac Catalina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Pontiac Catalina would be higher. At 6,891 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Pontiac Catalina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Pontiac Catalina (376 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 2003 Audi A4. (113 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Pontiac Catalina should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Pontiac Catalina weights approximately 590 kg more than 2003 Audi A4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Pontiac Catalina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Pontiac Catalina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Pontiac Catalina (625 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 477 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A4. (148 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1965 Pontiac Catalina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A4. 1965 Pontiac Catalina has automatic transmission and 2003 Audi A4 has manual transmission. 2003 Audi A4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Pontiac Catalina will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A4 | 1965 Pontiac Catalina | |
| Make | Audi | Pontiac |
| Model | A4 | Catalina |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 6891 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 625 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 103.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3080 mm |
