2003 Audi A6 vs. 1950 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2003 Audi A6 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Talbot T 26 (276 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2003 Audi A6. (128 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A6 weights approximately 515 kg more than 1950 Talbot T 26.
Because 1950 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A6 | 1950 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Audi | Talbot |
Model | A6 | T 26 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2510 mm |