2003 Audi A6 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2003 Audi A6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2003 Audi A6. (128 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 655 kg more than 2003 Audi A6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A6 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | A6 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 2085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3300 mm |
