2003 Audi A6 vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2003 Audi A6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A6 (226 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (156 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A6 weights approximately 167 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A6. (310 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A6 | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | A6 | Challenger |
Year Released | 2003 | 1969 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 5208 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1495 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |