2003 Audi A6 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2003 Audi A6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,669 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A6 (250 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A6 weights approximately 950 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A6 (339 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A6 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | A6 | 102 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 2669 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2160 mm |