2003 Audi A6 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2003 Audi A6 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A6 (226 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A6 weights approximately 892 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A6 (310 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A6 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Audi | Zastava |
| Model | A6 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 226 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2160 mm |
