2003 Audi A6 vs. 1986 Lada Riva
To start off, 2003 Audi A6 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lada Riva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lada Riva would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A6 (128 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1986 Lada Riva. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Lada Riva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A6 weights approximately 370 kg more than 1986 Lada Riva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Lada Riva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Lada Riva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A6 (195 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Lada Riva. (122 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Lada Riva.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A6 | 1986 Lada Riva | |
Make | Audi | Lada |
Model | A6 | Riva |
Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1569 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 79.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2420 mm |