2003 Audi A6 vs. 1987 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2003 Audi A6 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Mazda RX-7 (197 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2003 Audi A6. (178 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A6.
Because 1987 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A6 (370 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Mazda RX-7. (271 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A6 | 1987 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A6 | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1987 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 370 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2440 mm |