2003 Audi A6 vs. 2000 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2003 Audi A6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A6 (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 130 kg more than 2003 Audi A6.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Sierra (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A6. (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A6 | 2000 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Audi | GMC |
Model | A6 | Sierra |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2976 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1645 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3030 mm |