2003 Audi A6 vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2003 Audi A6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 620 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A6. (195 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A6 | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | A6 | HRT |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Top Speed | 198 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
