2003 Audi A6 vs. 2002 Xedos 9
To start off, 2003 Audi A6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Xedos 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Xedos 9 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A6 (226 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2002 Xedos 9. (161 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Xedos 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A6 weights approximately 77 kg more than 2002 Xedos 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A6 (310 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Xedos 9. (212 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Xedos 9.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Audi A6 | 2002 Xedos 9 | |
| Make | Audi | Xedos |
| Model | A6 | 9 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2671 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 226 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 212 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 1585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2760 mm |
