2003 Audi A6 vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A6 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A6 (226 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 465 kg more than 2003 Audi A6.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A6. (310 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A6 | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | E-150 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1662 kg | 2127 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.6 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 132 L |