2003 Audi A6 vs. 2006 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A6 would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2003 Audi A6. (178 HP @ 3300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A6.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Audi A6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A6 (370 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu I-350. (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu I-350.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A6 | 2006 Isuzu I-350 | |
Make | Audi | Isuzu |
Model | A6 | I-350 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2698 cc | 3458 cc |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 3300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 370 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 74 L |