2003 Audi A6 vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A6 (226 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 2003 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda 5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A6 (310 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A6 | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A6 | 5 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |