2003 Audi A6 vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A6 (226 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ranger.
Because 2003 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A6 (310 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A6 | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A6 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 209 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 74 L |