2003 Audi A6 vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50

To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Audi A6 (226 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A6 weights approximately 707 kg more than 2011 Mazda BT-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Audi A6 (310 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda BT-50.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Audi A6 2011 Mazda BT-50
Make Audi Mazda
Model A6 BT-50
Year Released 2003 2011
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2671 cc 2498 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 226 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 310 Nm 257 Nm
Torque RPM 1700 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 92 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 19.8:1
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1662 kg 955 kg
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 3010 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.6 L/100km 8.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]