2003 Audi A6 vs. 2012 Honda Civic
To start off, 2012 Honda Civic is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda Civic (201 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2003 Audi A6. (128 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 2003 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi A6 weights approximately 125 kg more than 2012 Honda Civic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Civic (230 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Audi A6. (195 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2012 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Audi A6.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Audi A6 | 2012 Honda Civic | |
Make | Audi | Honda |
Model | A6 | Civic |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1305 kg |
Fuel Consumption | 6.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |